[WCUSP] Why is the peace movement silent about AIPAC

Thu May 3 13:27:39 CDT 2007

Hi Yvonne and all,

I get solicitations from the Democratic Congressional Campaign
Committee, which I always send back without any money in them.
They are often on behalf of specific candidates, especially
Hillary, who has been doing a lot of kowtowing lately to AIPAC,
so I write a note saying, "As long as (insert name of candidate)
continues to bow to AIPAC, I am unwilling to support his/her
campaign".  If more of us would do this, perhaps they would
get the idea that such obeisance is losing support and funding,
and it might encourage them to think outside the AIPAC box!

Every time I am in D.C. and lobbying, or at local Congressional
offices, I point out that every Jew I know tells me that AIPAC
doesn't represent them!  In many cases, they are happy to hear
this and simply say, "If we heard it from more people, we would
be able to do what is right" (and that is a direct quote from
one of my former Congressmen!).  I think of myself as a mosquito
buzzing around them, making myself a nuisance, and sometimes
giving them a littled bite so that they remember me.

Thanks for this good article.

Barb T.

--- yvonne simmons <roweenayvonne at yahoo.com> wrote:

> 
>  
> 
> Subscribe Online
>  April 17, 2007
> 
> Capuano and Kucinich Come Clean About the Lobby
> Why is the Peace Movement Silent About AIPAC?
> By JOHN WALSH
> 
> "AIPAC!" was the forceful one-word answer of
> Congressman Michael Capuano when we asked him, "Why
> was the Iran clause forbidding war on Iran without
> Congressional approval taken out of the recent
> supplemental for the Iraq war funding?" I nearly fell
> out of my chair at his reply - not because this was
> news but because of who had just said it. Capuano is a
> close ally of Nancy Pelosi, her fixer and enforcer.
> That was last Friday morning when a small delegation
> from Cambridge and Somerville, MA, were visiting the
> Congressman, known for his bluntness, as part of the
> nationwide UFPJ (United For Peace and Justice) home
> lobbying effort during the Congressional recess.
> 
> Later that day, Dennis Kucinich made an appearance at
> Harvard, where he was asked the same question, the
> reason for removing the Iran provision. "AIPAC," I
> volunteered out loud. Kucinich looked my way and said,
> "Exactly." Again my chair almost failed to contain me.
> 
> A few weeks earlier we had gone to the offices of
> Senators Kennedy and then Kerry to discuss the war.
> (My intention was to call their attention to
> www.FilibusterForPeace.org to which the Kennedy aide
> was sympathetic and the Kerry aide predictably
> hostile.) I raised the question of AIPAC directly with
> Kerry's aide, inquiring about its hawkish influence on
> Kerry and other Senators. Suddenly the aide was quite
> engaged. Leaning forward, he said: "That will never be
> discussed publicly. That will never be discussed
> publicly." Clearly even Kerry's office is unhappy with
> the pressure that comes from AIPAC. 
> 
> It is widely acknowledged that the reps and senators
> are ticked at AIPAC, and their hostility seems to be
> growing these days. With upwards of 60% of their
> campaign contributions coming directly or indirectly
> from the Israel Lobby, the Democratic congressmen are
> not free to respond to their antiwar base. This opens
> them to an antiwar electoral challenge on the Left or
> Right from forces not subservient to AIPAC. And that
> could cost them their next election, a little thing
> which has them very worked up. Capuano's cry of
> "AIPAC" was no simple outburst of candor but a cri de
> coeur for his career. 
> 
> So here we have even Congressmen and Senator's aides
> complaining publicly about AIPAC. AIPAC is being outed
> all over the mainstream media, largely thanks to the
> door opening work of Mearsheimer and Walt. AIPAC is
> skewered routinely by Justin Raimondo on Antiwar.com
> and by Alex Cockburn and many others here on
> CounterPunch. But there remains no anti-AIPAC campaign
> within the mainstream antiwar organizations, like UFPJ
> or Peace Action. (Even one supposed Congressional ally
> of the peace movement was announced as a celebrity
> guest at the recent colossal AIPAC meeting in
> Washington, where half the Congress shows up and Dick
> Cheney is a regular speaker. What gives?) 
> 
> I have been told by leaders of the peace movement that
> AIPAC is a distraction from the main thrust of the
> antiwar movement. And so we should not engage it;
> AIPAC is to be immune. But with all due respect to the
> sentiments of that leadership, immunity for AIPAC is a
> prescription for disaster. To use a military analogy,
> which I do not especially like, suppose that we were
> trying to take a hill in Germany in 1944. And suppose
> we said that we would not attack one pillbox, which
> kept devastating our forces. Leave just that one
> pillbox alone! The result would be devastating; we
> would be cut down with every succeeding attempt at
> advance. So it is with AIPAC which campaigns
> relentlessly for war on Iraq, war on Iran, war on
> Syria, war on Lebanon and the slow genocide of the
> Palestinian people. AIPAC constantly puts the peace
> movement on the defensive while it is free to be on
> the offensive all the time. 
> 
> AIPAC is not just an issue for Jewish Americans or the
> Jewish wing of the peace movement like Jewish Voice
> for Peace; it is a major force, although not the only
> one, driving the U.S. to wars in the Middle East.
> AIPAC is no less a force for war than is the
> Republican National Committee. In fact it is worse,
> because it sinks its teeth into the foreign policy
> establishment of both parties, perhaps the Dems more
> so than the Republicans. If the peace movement is to
> be worth its salt, then it must take action against
> AIPAC. (It is marathon season here in Boston and my
> friend, Israeli expatriate Joshua Ashenberg, tells me
> that the foregoing thought harbors a logical error. As
> he says: "A 'movement' that does not work against
> AIPAC is NOT a peace movement by definition. It will
> not help if I call myself a marathon runner, while I
> never ran a marathon.")
> 
> In the Boston area, AIPAC appears to be especially
> powerful, and so we have a special responsibility to
> take it on. At the recent AIPAC conference in
> Washington, the delegates from Boston/New England were
> the most hawkish toward Iran. Just before the last
> election a notorious ad in the Boston Globe, cheering
> on the Israeli bombing of Lebanon, was engineered by
> the Jewish Community Relations Council, an arm of
> AIPAC here. Every major political figure in MA signed
> the ad, including our "liberal" governor, Deval
> Patrick, and supposed peacenik Congressman Jim
> McGovern. Only Conressmen Capuano and Delahunt
> withheld their signatures. In addition AIPAC appears
> to raise a lot of money in our neck of the woods. 
> 
> So I have a modest suggestion. On Sunday, April 29,
> beginning at 6 pm, AIPAC has its annual fundraising
> dinner at the Westin Hotel in Copley Square in Boston.
> (Last year a good table for 10 went for a modest
> $10,000.) Show up at 5 pm to protest the machinations
> of AIPAC. Which peace organizations in our area will
> be there? Which ones will promote the rally? And which
> will maintain their silence? 
> 
> * American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC)
> 
> John V. Walsh can be reached at John.Endwar at gmail.com.
> 
> 
> He urges one and all to sign and circulate the
> petition at WWW.FilibusterForPeace.org. The Senate
> Dems have the power to stop the war with 41 votes;
> tell them to use it.
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wcusp mailing list
> Wcusp at wilpf.org
> http://wilpf.org/mailman/listinfo/wcusp_wilpf.org
> To post a message to all the list members, send email to Wcusp at wilpf.org.
> To unsubscribe send a message to Wcusp-leave at wilpf.org
> 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 