[WCUSP] Emailing: JVP News Roundup July 29.htm

[Libby or Mort Frank]

JVP News Roundup July 29(Quite a roundup -- for those of you who don't get this kind of information.  Libby)


            JVP News Roundup July 29



            JVP News Roundup, July 29, 2007




            Congress is once again showing its remarkable ability to misunderstand the Middle East and to be more narrow-minded in its decisions regarding Arab states than even Israeli hawks.

            At issue now is a Middle East arms package that the Bush Administration plans to put into the next appropriations bill. It involves a 10-year commitment to do the following: 

              a.. provide $3 billion per year in military aid to Israel
              b.. provide $1.3 billion per year in military aid to Egypt
              c.. sell some $20 billion in arms to Saudi Arabia and five other Gulf states, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain and Oman.
            One should keep in mind that the US and Israel also work together to develop other defense systems, which often amount to additional American support for Israel, though this relationship is much more mutual than is often portrayed.

            The American strategy of flooding the Middle East with weapons, small and large, has already had the effect of greatly increasing the instability of the region. This new wave of arms supplies, crafted to maintain Israel's military superiority while simultaneously enabling America's Arab allies to strengthen their ability to stand up to increasing Iranian influence in the region, is certain to have similarly destabilizing results. That is not to say that the arms deal won't accomplish the goals outlined above, but that accomplishment will come along with other, unintended results.

            Principled, or even thoughtful, opposition to such a strategy would be welcome. A credible alternative that does not endanger Israel or other US interests might mean:

              a.. Israel is held accountable to its past commitments to the US upon which its aid is predicated (that it is to be used only for defense, that American weapons are not to be used against civilians) and that such aid is dependent on Israel's removing settlements and freezing all construction in the West Bank; 
              b.. engaging Iran in diplomacy, along with Saudi Arabia; 
              c.. that the US adhere to its own regulations that arms supplies be conditioned on adherence to human rights norms; 
              d.. that the US commits to supporting the security of all allied states that adhere to such regulations; 
              e.. that Iran, the US and the Arab states come together to work for a resolution to the crisis in Iraq; 
              f.. and that substantive negotiations begin for the resolution of the Israel-Palestine conflict, encompassing all areas under conflict, including the Golan heights and the Sheba'a Farms.

            These measures could be aimed at allaying the concerns over Saudi and Gulf states' acquisition of arms. Stabilizing the governments through enhanced human rights protections would greatly diminish the threat of those governments falling and the weapons ending up in the hands of parties who might use them against Israel, which is a fear in Congress. But all of this is beside the point--Israel's own Prime Minister has already accepted the idea of the US selling these arms to the Arab states. One would expect Congress, then, to follow his lead.

            Instead, what we get is Congressional saber-rattling that is positioned solidly to the right of the majority of Israeli political parties. There is no questioning of Israel's reception of aid, and even of it increasing, despite the fact that the enhancement of aid is specifically meant to offset the arms sales to the Arab states. Instead, there is blind opposition from key Democrats in Congress only to sales to Saudi Arabia, based on objections to the Saudi's stance on Iraq, and their attempt to re-unify the Palestinian factions. The short-sightedness of this opposition is hard to overstate.

            Congressional understanding of the Middle East is limited. They hear from "experts" largely supplied by only one side in the discussion, be they from AIPAC or the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP). There are always, of course, lobbying efforts supporting failed hard-line policies, but the educational efforts are just as important. The need for an alternative in Washington couldn't be more clear.

            Palestinians Stranded In Egypt

            Perhaps no situation serves as a better metaphor for the Palestinian plight than that of the 5-7,000 Palestinians who have been stranded at the Egypt-Gaza border ever since the Rafah crossing was closed after Hamas' takeover of the Gaza Strip.

            Few have taken the attitude that the suffering of these people on the border, where they have been stranded with little support, using up all of their money on temporary housing and food, should be alleviated quickly. Instead, people on all sides have used this dire situation to blame their opponents. 

            The Rafah crossing is administered on the Egyptian side by Egypt, working in consultation with Israel. On the Palestinian side, it had been administered by the Palestinian Authority with European Union monitors. When Hamas took over Gaza, they assumed sole control over the crossing and the EU monitors fled.

            With the Hamas takeover, Egypt closed the crossing. While this was certainly approved by Israel, it was just as clearly an Egyptian decision. Israel wants the crossing closed because, while the Palestinian side is under Hamas control, they fear that weapons smuggling will increase exponentially. But Egypt's concerns are much stronger, as they fear that the free flow of goods and people over the crossing will not only imply recognition of Hamas' control of Gaza, but will also help cement day-to-day connections between Hamas and their allies, including the Muslim Brotherhood, in Egypt. For much of this time, Egypt has done little to safeguard the welfare of the Palestinians at the border.

            Some have accused Fatah of blocking the return of the stranded Palestinians. In fact, they have no real influence on this situation. Hamas, on the other hand, has refused any alternative to opening the Rafah crossing, leaving the thousands of Palestinians in limbo. In the early days of their takeover of Gaza, they fired on the Kerem Shalom crossing in order to discourage even aid shipments from coming through. While that has abated, the message was sent that Hamas would enforce their decisions about entrance and exit from the Strip. They have made it clear that they oppose the alternatives proposed by Israel, be it through Kerem Shalom or by the more circuitous route now being proposed that would bring the stranded people up on PA sponsored buses to the Erez crossing at the northeastern end of Gaza and allow them to re-enter the strip there. Though Hamas has not threatened violence if such options are attempted, there is legitimate fear that they will resort to it to enforce their will. 

            Israel, for its part, is screening anyone coming through its territory among the stranded Palestinians. Any who are wanted by Israel would face arrest if they try to return. 

            For Hamas, this is an important point in establishing some recognition that they rule Gaza. With all parties refusing to talk to Hamas, including Israel, Egypt and Fatah, it is impossible to resolve the dispute. At this writing, 101 Palestinians had been brought through Erez without incident. But the possibility remains that there will be trouble, as Israel is only bringing people in at a slow pace, expecting some 700 more this week. Since this will continue to leave large numbers of people stranded and because this will require a large number of individual bus trips, each of which will draw considerable attention, the potential for problems from all sides remain. Still, one might hope that this is the beginning of the end of this crisis and that most or all of the stranded Palestinians will soon be home.

            In the end, all the leadership bodies--Fatah, Hamas, Israel and Egypt--played politics with the lives of Palestinians, most of whom, perhaps even all, are innocent civilians. That is the Palestinian tale of the past century writ small.

            In Israel


              a.. We reported last week on a bill in the Knesset that would permit the Israel Land Authority to discriminate against non-Jews in its administration of Jewish National Fund lands. For more information about this, click here. Now, the Reform movement has come out in opposition to this bill. This is a welcome development, as we are seeing clearly that world Jewry understands that just as we would never tolerate such discrimination against us, we cannot ourselves practice it. There is also an online petition against this bill which you can sign here.

              b.. Jordanian and Egyptian delegates, operating as representatives of the Arab League, visited Israel this past week. It's a very positive sign that the Arab leadership generally is trying to find more realistic ways of resolving the conflicts with Israel. Still, the fact that mixed messages, some saying that the delegates represented the Arab League, some saying they did not, came out demonstrates that, politically, there is still a lot of work to do. It will require real leadership, in Israel and in the Arab world, to move past the decades of fiery rhetoric toward an atmosphere where the sorts of agreements necessary to end this vexing conflict are possible.
              c.. While the latest polls in Israel demonstrate that, were elections held today, the number of seats Kadima would win varies greatly if Ehud Olmert runs again (7 seats) or if Tzipi Livni was heading the Kadima list (23 seats), they show that, in either case, Likud would likely win an election. Another poll portrayed the difference between Olmert and Livini as smaller, but still held victory for Likud. The dangers of such an outcome are obvious, especially as Likud, since the split that created Kadima, is an even more extremist party than it was before Ariel Sharon. 

            In the Palestinian Territories


              a.. Palestinian Legislative Council member, Dr. Mustafa Barghouti criticized British Foreign Minister David Milbrand for saying that a resolution of the Israel-Palestine conflict would not include the return of refugees to Israel. Barghouti said that "such statements will strongly harm the peace efforts and any possibility of finding a just solution to the Palestinian issue and ending the conflict in the region." The issue is not whether the statement is correct or not. But, like the foolish promise made by George W. Bush to Ariel Sharon in 2004 of a similar point, it means that Israel would not feel a need to negotiate on the refugee issue. By removing the central issue to the Palestinians from the realm of diplomacy, the possibility of negotiations for peace become much more remote.
              b.. A poll conducted by al-Najjar University yielded some interesting results:
                a.. 68% of Palestinians favor early elections for the PLC, 70% for the presidency
                b.. 49% favor a confederation between the West Bank and Jordan
                c.. Only 27% support Hamas' refusal to recognize the government Abbas recently formed
                d.. Only 26% believe Hamas is capable of managing Gaza
                e.. Among 76% who said they would participate in new elections, 55% would support a Fatah candidate, 16% Hamas
                f.. 67% reject the hamas claim that the PLO is illegitimate and not representative of the Palestinians. 27% support that claim

            More articles of interest
                  U.S. Christians voice support for Palestinian state

                  Palestinian gov't platform vows Islamic tolerance

                  What Use Were All The Wars?

                  Spokesperson of An Nasser Brigades threatens to target PM Fayyad 


                 
                  The latest on the blogs
                 
                  Muzzlewatch

                  Despicable: Abe Foxman slams only Muslim Congressman
                  From the archives: Larry Cohler-Esses of Jewish Week on AIPAC and censorship
                  Keeping Talk Radio Pro-Israel
                  Mapping the occupation: Ravensburger puzzle map responds to pressure, disappears Palestinian Occupied Territories
                  British academics' vote to consider moral implications of links with Israeli academic institutions causes backlash. Charges of anti-Semitism and crushing of free speech



                  The Third Way

                  Help Defeat Legalized Discrimination In Israel
                  "The Israel Lobby" in Perspective
                  Being Realistic About Peace

                  UN Sec. General Makes a Statement for Fairness
                  The Fall of Gaza: Can Disaster Be Avoided?

                  A Dearth of Leadership: The International Community Must Get Involved



                 



            © Copyright by JewishVoiceForPeace.org 

           
     
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://wilpf.org/pipermail/wcusp_wilpf.org/attachments/20070730/a8b63e41/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 8799 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://wilpf.org/pipermail/wcusp_wilpf.org/attachments/20070730/a8b63e41/attachment-0001.gif