[WCUSP] US/Bolton vetoes UN resolution condemning Israel for Gaza massacre
yvonne simmons
roweenayvonne at yahoo.com
Sun Nov 12 08:30:57 CST 2006
Hi, Don't you think we should have a rapid response to
this veto to our members. In peace Yvonne.
(
> U.S. vetoes U.N. resolution condemning Israel
> By Irwin Arieff 44 minutes ago
> UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - The United States on
> Saturday vetoed a _U.N.
> Security Council_
>
(http://search.news.yahoo.com/search/news/?p=U.N.+Security+Council)
> resolution urging an immediate withdrawal of
> Israeli forces from Gaza
> and condemning an Israeli attack there that killed
> 18 Palestinian civilians.
> Nine of the council's 15 members voted for the
> measure, while four
> abstained: Britain, Denmark, Japan and Slovakia.
> But the "no" vote cast by U.S. Ambassador John
> Bolton -- his second since he
> arrived at U.N. headquarters in August 2005 -- was
> enough to kill the
> resolution.
> Bolton's first veto, on July 13, 2006, killed a
> resolution reacting to an
> earlier Israeli incursion in Gaza.
> The United States has cast 82 vetoes in the
> United Nations' 61
> years, and nine of the last 10 council vetoes,
> seven of which dealt with the
> Israel-Palestinian conflict.
> The measure defeated on Saturday was backed by
> Arab, Islamic and nonaligned
> nations and formally proposed by Qatar.
> It would have called on the Palestinian
> Authority to "take immediate
> and sustained action to bring an end to violence,
> including the firing of
> rockets on Israeli territory."
> It would have urged the international community to
> take steps to stabilize
> the situation, revive the Middle East peace process
> and consider "the possible
> establishment of an international mechanism" for
> the protection of
> civilians.
> It also would have condemned Israeli military
> operations in Gaza and called
> on the Jewish state to withdraw all troops from
> Gaza and end its operations
> in all Palestinian lands.
> ACCIDENTAL 'TECHNICAL FAILURE'
> Seven children and four women were among the dead
> in Wednesday's shelling of
> Beit Hanoun, for which Prime Minister Ehud Olmert
> has apologized, calling it
> an accidental "technical failure" by the Israeli
> military.
> But Palestinian leaders have called it a massacre.
> Bolton said Washington regretted the loss of life
> but was "disturbed at
> language in the resolution that is in many places
> biased against Israel and
> politically motivated."
> He said the suggestion of a mechanism to protect
> civilians would raise false
> hopes, and he was disturbed the measure made no
> mention of the word
> "terrorism" or the Palestinians' elected Hamas
> government, which refuses to
> acknowledge Israel's right to exist or renounce
> violence.
> Palestinian U.N. Observer Riyad Mansour said Arab
> foreign ministers meeting
> in Cairo on Sunday would decide on the next steps
> following the measure's
> defeat. One option was to bring the measure to a
> vote in the 192-nation General
> Assembly, where Washington did not have veto power.
>
> The U.S. veto sent the wrong message to both
> Israeli and Palestinian
> militants, Mansour told reporters. "Will that help
> extremist elements to take issues
> into their own hands on both sides? You bet!"
> Governments that abstained said they were unable to
> support the text because
> it was unbalanced.
> "It is absolutely right that the Security Council
> should meet on this
> important issue," said British Deputy Ambassador
> Karen Pierce. But "any statement
> from this council must be balanced and must serve
> the interests of both
> parties, and that interest is peace."
> Congo Republic Ambassador Basile Ikouebe, who voted
> for the measure,
> expressed "deep disappointment" that the veto had
> prevented council members from
> being "able to express ourselves clearly on such a
> serious situation."
>
>
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
> Wcusp mailing list
> Wcusp at wilpf.org
> http://wilpf.org/mailman/listinfo/wcusp_wilpf.org
> To post a message to all the list members, send
> email to Wcusp at wilpf.org.
> To unsubscribe send a message to
Wcusp-leave at wilpf.org
____________________________________________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com
More information about the Wcusp
mailing list