[WCUSP] Nader comments on Democrats & the Middle East
Marlene Santoyo
marlsan at cavtel.net
Thu Nov 9 00:15:06 CST 2006
Wednesday, November 8th, 2006
Ralph Nader on Conservative Democrats, Corporate Power and the
Middle East
Listen to Segment || Download Show mp3
Watch 128k stream Watch 256k stream Read Transcript
Help Printer-friendly version Email to a friend
Purchase Video/CD
--------------------------------------------------------------------
We get analysis on Tuesday's election and the Democratic victory
in the House with consumer advocate and former presidential candidate, Ralph
Nader. Nader says, "This election was basically a mandateless election for
the Democrats, there was really no mandate other than against Bush and do
something about Iraq. Domestically there was virtually no mandate about
rearranging of power - shifting it from corporations to workers, consumers,
taxpayers, to communities." [includes rush transcript]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
When the 110th Congress convenes on January 3, Nancy Pelosi will
become Speaker of the House and Democrats will take control of all of the
House committees.
John Conyers of Michigan will become chair of the House
Judiciary Committee. Charles Rangel of New York will head the Ways and Means
Committee. Henry Waxman of California will become chair of the House
Government Reform Committee.
Last night Rahm Emanuel of Illinois, head of the Democratic
Congressional Campaign Committee, vowed reforms would be in order.
a.. Rahm Emanuel (D - IL), speaking at Democratic victory
rally, November 7th, 2006.
For analysis on Tuesday's election and the Democratic victory in
the House, consumer advocate and former presidential candidate Ralph Nader
joins us in Washington.
a.. Ralph Nader, ran for president in 2000 as a candidate on
the Green Party ticket. In 2004 he ran for President as an Independent. He
is the author of many books including "The Good Fight: Declare Your
Independence and Close the Democracy Gap."
--------------------------------------------------------------------
RUSH TRANSCRIPT
This transcript is available free of charge. However, donations
help us provide closed captioning for the deaf and hard of hearing on our TV
broadcast. Thank you for your generous contribution.
Donate - $25, $50, $100, more...
AMY GOODMAN: Last night, Rahm Emanuel of Illinois, head of the
Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, vowed reforms would be in
order.
REP. RAHM EMANUEL: The American people never lose their zeal
for reform, and neither can we. The old era of irresponsibility is over, and
the new era of real reform has just begun.
AMY GOODMAN: For analysis on Tuesday's election and the
Democratic victory in the House, we're joined by consumer advocate and
two-time presidential candidate, Ralph Nader, in Washington, D.C. Welcome to
Democracy Now!
RALPH NADER: Thank you, Amy.
AMY GOODMAN: It's good to have you with us. What is your
assessment of Election Day and the results?
RALPH NADER: Well, the assessment is that to the extent the
Democrats gained the majority in the House, it was on the backs of some very
rightwing Democrats who won the election against rightwing Republican
incumbents. And so, there was no mandate for any progressive agenda. For
example, in 1974, when the Democrats swarmed over the Republicans, it was on
the backs of many very progressive Democratic challengers who were elected.
And the same is true in the ’60s, when some very progressive senators like
Gaylord Nelson from Wisconsin was elected. But not this time. They're going
to have to deal with a lot of Blue Dog Democrats, and that's going to give
Pelosi great pause as she tries to maneuver a few things through the
Congress.
The other thing that is good, though, is that there's some very
good veteran chairmen who are coming in: George Miller, Henry Waxman, Ed
Markey and, of course, John Conyers. But to counter that, both John Conyers
and Nancy Pelosi have taken the impeachment issue right off the table,
before the election, and that means there's going to be no Bush
accountability for his war crimes and his inflation of unlawful presidential
authority.
AMY GOODMAN: And yet, Ralph Nader, when asked -- when Nancy
Pelosi was asked what would be the difference if the Democrats took over,
she said subpoena power.
RALPH NADER: Well, alright, that gets to a real gridlock
situation. The Democrats will throw a lot of subpoenas at the White House.
The White House will, of course, drag it on and on and on. And the public
will get fed up with it. The White House has great reserves in dragging it
on and on and on. Because Bush can't rely on Republicans as a majority of
the Congress, he's going to inflate his presidential power even more
extremely and unlawfully, in the opinion of many legal scholars, to do
through the inherent power of the presidency, as Dick Cheney and Bush have
talked about, what he can't do through the Congress, which he no longer
controls.
But notice that, in all the debates I’ve heard between the
Senate candidates and the House candidates over the last few weeks, there
was almost no mention of corporate power, the 800-pound gorilla, no mention
of corporate crime, no drive for corporate reform. And yet, if you look at
the forward issues in the country, who’s saying no to healthcare, universal
healthcare? Corporate power. Who’s saying no to a real crackdown on
corporate crime against consumers, especially inner-city consumers?
Corporate power. Who’s saying no to cleaning up the corrupt tens of billions
of dollars in military contracting fraud, like Halliburton? Corporate power.
Who’s saying no to reform of hundreds of billions of dollars of diversion of
your tax dollars, America, to corporate subsidies, handouts and giveaways?
Corporate power. And yet, reporters and candidates hardly mentioned it.
Kevin Zeese, the Green Party candidate, did in Maryland for the Senate.
Howie Hawkins did in New York, the Green Party candidate for the Senate.
AMY GOODMAN: And certainly, Bernie Sanders makes that a major
issue. It is the main point of his politics. And he's been elected. He's
going to be the first socialist senator in the US Senate.
RALPH NADER: Well, there won't be much socialism to him, but
he'll be a fresh voice, a very welcome voice along with Sherrod Brown. So
that, you know, you can stop certain bad things in the Senate with two or
three senators near the end of the session, so -- the way Metzenbaum and
Abourezk did in the ’70s -- so that's a welcome break. But there are some --
AMY GOODMAN: Ralph Nader, let me ask you about Connecticut,
because that's where you’ve spent a good amount of the last months, and
here, yes, the independent candidate Joseph Lieberman beat out the antiwar
Democratic candidate who had unseated him in the Democratic primary, Ned
Lamont.
RALPH NADER: Well, that was a bizarre type of situation, because
the Republican candidate was not able to get more than 10% of the vote. So
Lieberman got 70% of the Republican voters in Connecticut, and that's what
won for him. He would have been history, if the Republicans respected their
own voters in Connecticut and nominated someone who could get 20%, 25%, 30%
of the vote. He's going to be pretty insufferable. I mean, you know, Joe’s
inherent self-righteousness now is ballooning by the hour, and he's going to
view himself as a kingmaker if the swing in the Senate is one seat. But he
was the darling of the big business lobby, Chamber of Commerce, here in
Washington, who anointed him. And that's the power and greed lobby. And he
was their favorite Democratic senator, only one of two.
AMY GOODMAN: Is it absolutely known that he will caucus with
Democrats, number one? And number two, is there any discussion about him --
perhaps the Bush administration, who's deeply indebted to him, offering him,
say, Secretary of Defense, if they don't stick with Rumsfeld, to get him out
of the Senate to put in a Republican? And would he take it?
RALPH NADER: There's no doubt in my mind he's going to caucus
with the Democrats. He knows where his bread is buttered, where his friends
are, where his contributors are, one. And he can play that both sides of the
aisle, as he has for years as a Democrat. And he can get a committee chair
if the Democrats win. I don't think he'll take an executive position. This
is a failing administration. He would never want to be a Secretary of
Defense in a Bush administration.
AMY GOODMAN: What about the other congressional races in
Connecticut? Very significant. You're talking about corporate power. Nancy
Johnson is one of those Republican incumbents who went down, very well-known
for representing the pharmaceutical industry, the insurance industry.
RALPH NADER: Yes. That was a surprise. She worked the precincts
very carefully over the years, always went back home. But I think her
opponent two years ago, [Maloney], congressman, when they were redistricted,
damaged her credibility by pouring ads showing she was the agent of the drug
industry and the big HMOs. I think he set her up for defeat by Chris Murphy
yesterday.
AMY GOODMAN: What about the war, this being a vote against war?
And what does that mean for Democrats right now? What happens?
RALPH NADER: Well, it means vagueness. Nancy Pelosi was very
vague. She said there's got to be a redirection, there’s got to be a change.
But the Democrats don't have the guts to really have a withdrawal plan.
Internationalizing the situation there; having internationally supervised
elections; having people of stature bring the three sectarian groups
together, as they have in the past -- the Kurds and Shiites and Sunnis in
the ’50s arranged a modest autonomy within a unified Iraq -- and bringing
in, in an Islamic nation, peacekeepers, these things require real high-level
diplomacy, and the Democrats, you know, are not in the executive branch.
Bush is going to stay the course. He's already announced that he's going to
be in Iraq until the last day of his office. So this will be a test of
Hillary Clinton and others, and I don't think they're going to be able to
meet it.
AMY GOODMAN: What about what's happening in the Middle East, in
Israel, Palestine, Lebanon? The latest attack on Beit Hanun has killed
something like eighteen people, thirteen of one family. You certainly spoke
out over the Israeli bombing of Lebanon. Will this ever become a major issue
in the US Congress?
RALPH NADER: Certainly the Democrats are not going to make it a
major issue. Nancy Pelosi and others have been with the pro-Israeli lobby
for years. Certainly Bush and Cheney aren't. They don't understand that the
greatest move toward national security in our country and in the so-called
effort against terrorism would be to solve the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.
The majority of both people would like a two-state solution. There are
extremists in Israel that would like to continue to dominate the West Bank
and harass Gaza and block an exit of the people there for traveling and for
export of goods. So it's just -- it’s now a steady state, destruction every
day of innocent people, as you say, thirteen in one family. The Israeli
military know how to pacify Gaza. They know they could take over that town,
where these primitive rockets that are wildly inadequate are fired. But it
serves the interest of certain political interests in Israel to continue
this kind of conflict.
This is an eminently resolvable conflict. There's a lot of
former Israeli military and intelligence people who know how to do it,
people in the Knesset who know what needs to be done. But as long as the US
basically says to whoever is in charge, “You can do whatever you want over
there, and we'll still pump $3 - $4 billion and cluster bomb weapons, etc.,”
there's not going to be a resolution. As long as there's no resolution,
there’s going to be an inflammation increasing all over the Islamic world,
and our national security will be compromised.
This campaign, this election, Amy, was basically a mandate-less
election for the Democrats. There was really no mandate other than against
Bush and do something about Iraq. Domestically, virtually no mandate about
rearranging of power, shifting it from corporations to workers, consumers,
taxpayers, to communities.
AMY GOODMAN: Ralph Nader, you mentioned Sherrod Brown, certainly
will be one of the most progressive members of a new US Senate. Yet, in
those waning days, as he was running for this Senate seat that he has just
won from Ohio, he voted for the Military Commissions Act of 2006. Can you
talk about the significance of this act?
RALPH NADER: That was a bad sign. That was, I think, not just a
strategic mistake by Sherrod Brown. He's going to regret this. It was a
character deficiency, just like, you know, Hillary Clinton's character
deficiency. She refused to debate three third party Senate candidates,
including Howie Hawkins in the Green Party, and the League of Women Voters
was so upset, they withdrew co-sponsorship of the debate. We've got to focus
on the ability of the Democrats to become very, very politically cynical in
order to win. I don't think Sherrod Brown had to do that to win. That is a
monstrous laceration of our constitutional rights, that Military
Commissions. I hope it will be declared unconstitutional in its noxious
provisions by the Supreme Court.
AMY GOODMAN: Ralph Nader, Hillary Clinton. There is some
discussion that if, in fact, Democrats do take the Senate -- there are two
very tightly contested races now, of course, Virginia and Montana, although
at this point Democrats have very narrow leads in them -- the possibility
that she would become the Majority Leader of the Senate.
RALPH NADER: Well, I don't think so. It's very hard to be
Majority Leader of the Senate and run for president, which she's going to
start to do right away. I think what we're seeing here is a drive for a
coronation in the Democratic nomination. As Mark Warner drops out, maybe
John Kerry has been damaged, I mean, she's going to have a huge war chest
and just march to the nomination. And to do that, she's got to be absent a
great deal from the Senate. And when you're Majority Leader in the Senate,
you’ve got to be the valet for a lot of senators and you can't go out to
Colorado or California or New York or West Virginia, as a presidential
candidate has to.
AMY GOODMAN: The issue of money and politics, something you take
on in a very big way. According to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive
Politics, at least 2.8 billion dollars were spent in this election, making
these the most expensive midterm elections in history. I want to talk about
this big money in the big parties, the two big parties, and also third party
politics today, and what you saw around the country.
RALPH NADER: Well, first of all, the mess with the voting
machinery and the registration situation, this country is a mockery of
obstructing people to vote, going back to the post-Civil War era. Now they
have new ways to do it through these machines, through not distributing the
machines, through challenging people's voting credentials. There's no other
Western democracy that requires registration. In Canada, if you are counted
as part of the regular census, you vote, period.
And so, what we need in this country, first of all, is a
complete reform of electoral laws, including one federal standard for
candidates running for federal office, for Congress and for the President,
not 50 different state standards and more county standards. There needs to
be criminal prosecutions. Notice you can obstruct people's right to vote,
you can do what happened in Ohio and Florida, and because both parties want
to be able to do it, if they're in power, at the state level, there's no
prosecution tradition here, as there is, say, for procurement fraud. So
nobody goes to jail. So, every two or four years, it's going to happen, more
and more and more. And the number of ways that people can be obstructed from
voting -- votes can be miscounted; that people can be falsely designated as
ex-felons; the extent to which voting rolls can be shrunken, like in
Cleveland, Ohio, by a Republican state government, Blackwell, Secretary of
State -- all this is going to happen again and again, unless you have
crackdowns, unless you have task forces that will prosecute these
violations, and unless you have a national debate about universal voting,
Amy.
We've got to ask ourselves -- jury duty is the only civic duty
in our Constitution. We have a whole Bill of Rights, but we have very few
duties. And if we have to obey thousands of laws passed by lawmakers, it
seems to me that having voting be a civic duty, as it is in Australia and
Brazil and some other countries, is the way to clear away all these
manipulations and obstructions, because if you have a legal duty to vote --
AMY GOODMAN: You mean, mandatory.
RALPH NADER: Yes. If you have the duty to vote, then obstructing
it becomes a very serious crime, whereas now it's just, you know, the
political game the two parties play against one another. And the discussion
of mandatory voting would include a binding “none of the above.” So you can
go to the polls or absentee vote for the ballot line, you can vote write-in,
you can vote for your own person, write in your own name, or you can vote
for a binding “none of the above.” I think that takes care of any civil
liberties problems. But it should be decided by a special national
referendum.
AMY GOODMAN: Ralph Nader, we have to wrap up, but I just want to
ask: Hillary Clinton spent something like $30 million on an almost
uncontested race at the point where, you know -- of yesterday, certainly
getting more nationally known. Are you going to be running for president in
2008?
RALPH NADER: It's too early to say. I do want to give you one
quick sidebar, Amy. In Morgan County, USA, in Morgan County, West Virginia,
with a 60% Republican registration advantage, the incumbent for county
commissioner was defeated overwhelmingly, by 20 points, by a challenger. She
beat him by 20 points. And that was done by person-to-person campaigning,
which I think is going to be the way progressives in this country are going
to win elections. This is a stunning victory over a Republican machine that
ought to be studied, in Morgan County, West Virginia.
AMY GOODMAN: Ralph Nader, I want to thank you very much for
joining us, two-time presidential candidate, joining us from Washington,
D.C.
To purchase an audio or video copy of this entire program, click
here for our new online ordering or call 1 (888) 999-3877.
Amy Goodman Launches Column
Ask your local newspaper to run it!
DN! at 10!
100 City Tour
DN! 10th Anniversary
& Launch of New Book STATIC by Amy & David Goodman
Static hits the Bestseller Lists:
NY Times
LA Times
N. Calif/S. Calif Indep't Booksellers
11/05: Barre, VT
11/09: New York, NY
11/11: San Francisco
11/11: Fort Bragg, CA
11/12: San Luis Obispo, CA
11/13: New York, NY
11/16: Stony Brook, NY
11/18: Miami, FL
11/19: Washington, DC
more
Amy Goodman on The Colbert Report
Click to Watch
Goodman on MSNBC's 10th Anniversary
Why was Donahue axed? Where are the voices of peace?
Watch/Read Transcript
DN! at 10!
New! 10-CD audiobook read by Amy Goodman with DN! excerpts.
The Exception to the Rulers
SIGNED EDITIONS
Hardcover/Paperback
Lies of our Times: The NYTimes & Judith Miller
Read book excerpt on ”Hiroshima Cover-up“
Baltimore Sun: Hiroshima Cover-up
TODAY'S STORIES
Headlines for November 8, 2006
Los Titulares de Hoy: Democracy Now!'s daily news summary
translated into Spanish
Democrats Seize Control of House in Widespread Voter Rejection
of President Bush and Iraq War, Senate Hangs on Virginia and Montana
Minnesota Legislator Keith Ellison Becomes First Muslim Elected
to Congress
Vermont's Bernie Sanders Becomes First Socialist Elected to
U.S. Senate
Ralph Nader on Conservative Democrats, Corporate Power and the
Middle East
Record 200 Ballot Initiatives Include Abortion, Gay Marriage,
Affirmative Action, and Minimum Wage Measures
The Midterm Elections: An Iraqi Perspective
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.430 / Virus Database: 268.14.0/524 - Release Date: 2006/11/8
1:40 PM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/wcusp_wilpf.org/attachments/20061109/8ef15115/attachment-0001.html
More information about the Wcusp
mailing list