[WCUSP] Helena Cobban: Protecting Palestinian females: HRW misses the mark.
KATHARLOW at aol.com
KATHARLOW at aol.com
Tue Nov 7 21:28:23 CST 2006
_'Just World News' by Helena Cobban_ (http://justworldnews.org/)
Info, analysis, discussion-- to build a more just world
November 7, 2006 4:14 PM EST | _Link_
(http://justworldnews.org/archives/002213.html)
Protecting Palestinian females: HRW misses the mark
posted by Helena Cobban
I truly do not understand some of the decisions that my colleagues and
friends at Human Rights Watch have been making. This week, to much fanfare, they
rolled out a very _well-funded study_ (http://hrw.org/reports/2006/opt1106/)
about domestic violence in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, in which
their main order of business is to blame the Palestinian Authority for having,
"failed to establish an effective framework to respond to violence against
women and girls."
Look, as a woman, as someone who survived some long-ago domestic violence,
as the mother of two daughters, and as quite simply a member of the human race
I am deeply concerned about the question of domestic violence. But this
study seems wrongly conceived and wrongly focused for a number of reasons:
(1) The study makes no mention whatsoever that I can see of the huge amount
of physical and systemic violence inflicted on Palestinian females by the
Israeli occupation forces. Why not? It does make a few namby-pamby references
along the way to the impediments that the Israeli occupation's roadblocks,
lockdowns etc place in the way of participants in the Palestinian justice system
who might want to help remedy the plight of Palestinian females suffering
domestic violence. But why no mention at all of Israel's own use of lethal
violence against Palestinian females?
Just in the past few days, the Israelis have killed at least three adult
women and one girl in Gaza, maybe more. (See two of those reported _here_
(http://www.pchrgaza.org/files/PressR/English/2006/122-2006.htm) .) Back in July,
the Israelis _killed 20 women_
(http://www.btselem.org/english/firearms/20060808_Civilians_killed_in_Gaza.asp) in Gaza in one month alone. And so it goes on
and on and on-- lives of women snuffed out or blighted forever through
wounding or bereavement-- at the hands of Israel, the occupier. But no mention at
all in this HRW report.
(2) The report _states_
(http://hrw.org/reports/2006/opt1106/3.htm#_Toc148851329) that, "the PA holds ultimate responsibility for protecting victims and
holding perpetrators accountable." In my judgment this is quite incorrect.
Israel has never relinquished its responsibilities (or rights) under
international law to act as the occupying power in the West Bank and Gaza. It is
therefore, pending a final peace settlement that addresses the sovereignty issues
in those areas, the power that bears the "ultimate responsibility" for the
protection of life and public security in those areas. The PA is just acting, as
it were, as an intermittent sub-contractor to the occupying power.
Certainly, Israel retains the right to arrogate back to itself at any time that it
chooses, any of the powers that the PA may exercise-- and it has done so very
frequently and very freely, in both territories. (For example, when it sent
tanks back into Ramallah in 2002 or since, or into Gaza last month, this did not
constitute an "international incident" or an "act of war" against a
neighboring state. It was simply Israel exercising the rights as occupier in those
areas that it has never relinquished... Which is not to say, of course, that
the way in which it has exercised those rights has always been legal. It has
not. But it does show that Israel claims the right to re-enter at any point, at
any time-- and that the Security Council and the rest of the international
"community" agrees with this assessment.)
So for HRW to haul the PA onto the mat of blame now as bearing the "ultimate
responsibility" for harms that befall Palestinian females, while criticising
Israel only very tangentially for hampering the PA from doing its job is, I
believe, seriously to miss the mark.
It is, I repeat, Israel, as occupying power, that has established all the
conditions of life (and death) for the Palestinians of the occupied territories
and that must be held primarily reponsible for them.
One of the main conditions of life that Israel has established has been its
own frequent use of lethal force against all Palestinians, including women,
as noted above. Another has been its imposition of tight constraints on the
ability of Palestinians in both territories to carry out anything like a normal
human existence-- through the imposition of stifling movement control
regimes, economic boycott, etc etc.
Is it any wonder that under those demeaning and sometimes life-threatening
conditions of life, many Palestinian families have found themselves stressed
out to the point where stronger family members increase their use of
"domestic" violence against weaker family members? This is a classic example of what
Israeli saint _Amira Hass calls_
(http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/770053.html) "The Experiment."
It would be good if every single person at Human Rights Watch responsible
for producing this latest little report could go back and re-read the whole of
Hass's great mid-October article on that topic. Here's some of what she wrote:
The experiment was a success: The Palestinians are killing each other. They
are behaving as expected at the end of the extended experiment called "what
happens when you imprison 1.3 million human beings [in Gaza, alone] in an
enclosed space like battery hens."
These are the steps in the experiment: Imprison (since 1991); remove the
prisoners' usual means of livelihood; seal off all outlets to the outside world,
nearly hermetically; destroy existing means of livelihood by preventing the
entry of raw materials and the marketing of goods and produce; prevent the
regular entry of medicines and hospital supplies; do not bring in fresh food
for weeks on end; prevent, for years, the entry of relatives, professionals,
friends and others, and allow thousands of people - the sick, heads of
families, professionals, children - to be stuck for weeks at the locked gates of the
Gaza Strip's only entry/exit...
It is the good old Israeli experiment called "put them into a pressure
cooker and see what happens," and this is one of the reasons why this [Palestinian
factional violence] is not an internal Palestinian matter.
Hass's article, by the way, refers more generally to the incidence of
political violence among members of the different armed factions in the OPTs. But
it is also completely applicable to the issue of intra-family violence there.
But from HRW, all we get is just a few very veiled references to the
"difficult conditions of life" being experienced by the Palestinians... Certainly,
no recognition whatsoever that it is the Israeli occupation administration
that must-- under international law-- be held fully responsible for those
conditions of life.
(3) The level of "research" carried out by HRW for this study is laughably
inadequate, and certainly nowhere near sufficient to have propelled the study
into so many of the august tribunes of the western MSM. The study makes no
attempt whatsoever to quantify the incidence of domestic violence in the OPTs
or even to provide any form of rough comparison between the level there and
the level in other countries. All _we are told_
(http://hrw.org/reports/2006/opt1106/3.htm) is that, "A significant number of women and girls in the
Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT) are victims of violence perpetrated by family
members and intimate partners", and
Various studies and statistics gathered by the Palestinian Central Bureau of
Statistics (PCBS) and Palestinian women’s groups record high levels of
violence perpetrated by family members and intimate partners, aggravated during
times of political violence. Information obtained from social workers,
academics, and police officials on the prevalence of domestic violence, incest, and
actual or threatened “honor” crimes, also indicate that reported rates do not
reflect the full extent of such violence...
Then from there the report leaps almost immediately to concluding that "it
is already well established that violence against women and girls inside the
family is a serious problem in the OPT." And that's the best that the attempt
at quantification can produce.
My own estimation? I believe it is entirely possible that the incidence of
domestic violence in Palestine may be lower than that in the US, where the
physical and social isolation of many small family units leaves the women in
those families particularly vulnerable... But I recognize that we simply do not
know about the level, in either place.
Yes, I know there are always under-reporting problems in this domain. But
what, actually, do the reports that do exist from palestine exist tell us about
the situation there? And can they demonstrate this stated link between
domestic violence and the incidence of political violence? That, at least, would
be interesting and significant to know. But the HRW report presents no serious
attempts at any form of quantification or even of estimation. We are all
just invited to take on trust the general trope that "there's a lot of it about,
out there in Palestine." I note that just exactly this same same kind of
lazy trope-- claiming concern for women's rights and women's interests-- was
used to justify all kinds of colonial depradations of various parts of the world
by the colonial powers of centuries past. A case of plus ça change plus c'est
la même chose here perhaps?
That summary linked to there also tells us, regarding the methodology the
HRW people used for the report, that
This report is based on more than one hundred interviews conducted in
Jerusalem, Ramallah, Bethlehem, Nablus, Hebron, Tulkarem, Jericho, and Gaza in Novem
ber and December 2005; follow up communications with many of the same
individuals by telephone and email as well as a handful of new interviews in June
and July 2006; and examination of relevant laws, academic literature, policy
analyses, surveys, and other published materials...
Of the one hundred interviews, as far as I can tell, roughly half were with
social workers, government officials, and other professionals, and roughly
half with women who were themselves actual survivors of domestic violence.
This scale of interviewing, and the preparation and publication of a lengthy
report like this, use up considerable resources. (And this, from an
organization that is always begging me and others to give it more money.) I think
that from their elegant perch in the Empire State Building, the HRW leaders
could have chosen some campaigns that would have been far, far more effective in
bringing increased protection to the lives and wellbeing of Palestinian
females. They could have started by insisting that Israel
* end its promiscuous recourse to the use of lethal force,
* lift the illegal blocade it maintains on Gaza and on the institutions of
the PA in general, and
* dismantle both the system of checkpoints and barricades it has erected
deep inside the Palestinian West Bank and the network of (completely illegal,
and very damaging) Israeli settlements in the West Bank.
Then they could continue by urging our own legislative and executive powers
here in the US to cut off all the financial and political support that has
allowed Israel to persist in these anti-humane (including anti-female) policies
for many years.
Moves like those would make a huge improvement in the conditions of life for
Palestinian women and their family members... And until Israel enacts such
changes, we can expect only that Palestinian women and their menfolk will
remain, sadly, trapped in the belly of "the Experiment."
But HRW did not mention wide-reaching, humane, and effective steps like
those. No, instead they just chose to beat up on the quite powerless and always
vulnerable "Palestinian Authority." No marks for bravery, friends.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/wcusp_wilpf.org/attachments/20061107/dde9301d/attachment.html
More information about the Wcusp
mailing list