WILPF responds to Ahmadinejad's Columbia talk
"Mr. President, you exhibit all the signs of a petty and cruel dictator."
In all cultures and faith, it is tradition and custom to treat your invited guest with dignity and respect. As Columbia University President Lee Bollinger, in an unscholarly manner and subscribing to America's newfound doctrine of "pre-emptive strike", insulted and attacked his invited guest, the President of Iran. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad sat motionless listening to his hosts demeaning remarks. Bollinger's introduction of the President was disrespectful and cutting to not only the President of Iran but also to the Iranian people, Muslims across the globe, and socially conscious citizens of the world. Bollinger's comments were more of an indictment by a trial lawyer rather than an introduction by an open-minded Ivy League scholar. The insults inflicted on Ahmadinejad helped him win support of his chief opponents in Iran, including Iranian Jews and Muslims in general. Most agree that Ahmadinejad is a controversial figure; he should be subjected to tough questions in the realm of scholarly debate. However, it is not fair to say that history repeats itself in this case. During the Cold War, even as Russia and the United States were battling, Russian leaders and diplomats were given due respect and protocol when they addressed the United Nations. Even last year, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, despite his rhetoric, was greeted with more respect than Ahmadinejad. How would the news media, domestic or international, react if President George W. Bush had been introduced in a similar fashion at a university in Iran? Americans should ponder at the way Ahmadinejad was treated and how this image is portrayed throughout the international media. While the United States media focuses on Ahmadinejad's detachment from reality, the rest of the world is focused on Bollinger's callous introduction, giving Ahmadinejad the break he desperately needed. At a time when we are constantly asking the question "Why do they hate us", it is no wonder that Bollinger's actions will be used as justifications by hardliners around the globe to further their cause. We can win over our enemies' heart with dialogue, understanding, and tolerance; insult and high handedness simply escalates hatred. As the audience at Columbia University and some Americans laughed at the way Ahmadinejad was ridiculed, let's not be blind and forget that most of the world is not laughing with us.
--
Anum Malik, Fall Intern, WILPF US Section office
Submitted by jodster on 26 September 2007 - 1:42pm.
WILPF Ignores Irans Horrific Abuse of Women
The article above about the visit of the rightwing reactionary women hating religious fanatic Iranian President to Colombia University is accurate but so one-sided that virtually nobody outside of the far-left could ever unite with it! WILPF should have also simultaneously taken on the IRANIAN slavery of it's women citizens and should have called for the women of Iran to rise up and to fight for their freedom, in addition to simultaneously calling for the defeat of the US Imperialists who are threatening IRAN with war in order to pump up the US Empire, ensure a steady supply of Oil and to protect it's Frankenstein monster-baby freak Country of Israel.
login or register to post comments
Two years after the CIA's 1953 coup in Iran, Columbia University also gave an honorary "Doctors of Law" degree to Iran's "Great Dictator": the Shah of Iran. Then, in 1977, the dictatorial Shah of Iran's wife, Empress Farah Pahlavi, was given an honorary presidential citation by former Columbia University President William McGill, despite the protests of the Confederation of Iranian student demonstrators about the human rights situation in Iran prior to the 1979 Iranian revolution.
|
Recent blog posts
Search |